The National Regulatory Research Institute (NRRI) was founded in 1976 by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC). NRRI serves as a research arm to NARUC and its members, the utility regulatory commissions of the fifty states and the District of Columbia in the United States. NRRI’s primary mission is to produce and disseminate relevant and applicable research for NARUC members.
To serve state utility regulators by producing and disseminating relevant, high-quality research that provides the analytical framework and practical tools necessary to improve their public interest decision-making.
The NARUC-NRRI Relationship
NRRI was founded in 1976 by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC). While corporately independent, NARUC and NRRI are linked in multiple ways to ensure accountability. NRRI’s formation and its dues structure were approved by NARUC’s Board of Directors. NRRI’s bylaws were approved by the NARUC Board’s Executive Committee. State commissioners constitute a majority of NRRI’s Board. NARUC’s Executive Committee receives regular reports on NRRI from its Second Vice President, who is an ex officio member of NRRI’s Board. The NARUC Board’s Education and Research Subcommittee evaluates NRRI’s performance and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors. NARUC’s Executive Director is a member of the NRRI Board and NARUC’s Chief Financial Officer is a member of the audit committee of NRRI’s Board.
NRRI serves as a research instrument to its dues payers. NARUC, as the association of all state regulators, is invested in quality research serving its members. NRRI will coordinate its activities to support NARUC’s policy, research, educational and member-support service to state commissions.
What's New / What's Next:
NRRI Webinar Series
NRRI webinars are hosted once a month on a Wednesday from 2:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. ET.
Committee on Consumers and the Public Interest Webinar: Disconnections and Delinquencies, Part III
This webinar is the third in the Series hosted by the NARUC Committee on Consumers in the Public Interest, NASUCA, and NRRI on the topic of data collection for utility disconnections and delinquencies. The purpose of this series will be to gain a greater understanding of the data collection processes throughout the country in order to make recommendations for data collection policies related to utility disconnections and delinquencies.
This webinar will utilize a TED talk format that will allow several speakers to highlight success stories related to standardized data collection processes and best practices related to reducing delinquencies and disconnections.
Hon. Marion Gold, Ph.D., Commissioner, Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission
David Kolata, Executive Director, Illinois Citizens Utility Board
Cynthia Riely, Maryland Peoples Counsel
James Williams, Ohio Consumer Counsel Panelist
Recent Research Papers, NRRI Insights and more
NRRI 19-03 State Responses to Net Neutrality
NRRI 19-02 State Universal Service Funds 2018: Updating the Numbers
Universal Service is a key component of both federal and state communications policy. Its goal is to ensure that regardless of where they live, all citizens have access to robust, reliable communications services, including broadband connectivity, at affordable rates, with “reasonably comparable service” across the country. The four Federal Universal Service funds (FUSF)—High Cost/Connect America (CAF), Schools and Libraries (E-Rate), Lifeline, and Rural Healthcare—provide financial support to carriers (and, in the case of the Lifeline fund, consumers) to bring 21st century communications services to users across the country. Download the paper here
NRRI 19-01 Review of State Net Energy Metering
The objective of this paper is to summarize actions now being taken in many states to change rate designs for distributed energy resources (DER) on the customer side of the meter. Net energy metering (NEM) has been the most common rate design used for customers with small-scale generators that provide what is sometimes known as self-service power. Recently, there has been considerable interest in finding alternatives to net metering by legislatures and public utility commissions (PUCs), with some related deliberations underway or recently concluded in at least 48 states and the District of Columbia. These actions sometimes arise from preexisting legislative or regulatory requirements that trigger reviews when the total installed NEM system capacity or energy production, either for individual utilities or statewide, reaches a predetermined threshold. In other cases, regulatory reviews have been requested by utility companies through proposals to replace net-metering with other alternatives.